Compare

Head-to-head comparisons

The two accounts you’re torn between, side by side — rates pulled from our live data, conditions spelled out, and a plain-English verdict on which one suits you.

Savings accounts

ING vs ubank

Two of Australia's most popular bonus savers, side by side. ING rewards a monthly deposit plus card spend; ubank leads with an intro rate and a simpler balance-growth condition. Here's which suits you.

Compare →

ubank vs Macquarie

Both reward you without asking for card purchases — but in different ways. ubank wants your balance to grow each month; Macquarie pays a welcome rate then a strong no-strings ongoing rate. Here's the trade-off.

Compare →

ING vs Macquarie

A classic conditional bonus saver against a no-strings high-rate account. ING pays more if you jump through monthly hoops; Macquarie keeps it simple. Which model wins for you?

Compare →

Rabobank vs ING

An intro-rate leader versus an ongoing-bonus stalwart. Rabobank's headline rate is high but introductory; ING's bonus rate is lower but lasts as long as you meet the conditions. Which earns more over time?

Compare →

Macquarie vs Rabobank

Two no-conditions savers with very different shapes. Macquarie pairs a welcome period with a strong ongoing rate; Rabobank leads on the headline but reverts to a lower rate after four months. Which earns more depends on whether you'll move.

Compare →

ANZ Online Saver vs Progress Saver

ANZ's two everyday savers, side by side. The Progress Saver pays a higher rate if you save regularly; the Online Saver is condition-free but lower. Both sit well below the leading savers — here's the trade-off, and the alternatives.

Compare →

CommBank vs NAB saver

Two big-four bonus savers with easy monthly conditions. Both reward simple saving behaviour rather than card spend — so it's about which condition fits your habits and where you bank.

Compare →

ubank vs Rabobank

Two top-rate savers with no card-spend hoops, but different shapes. ubank rewards growing your balance each month; Rabobank leads on the headline with an introductory rate that reverts. Which earns more depends on whether you'll keep switching.

Compare →

Term deposits

Home loans

Unloan vs Macquarie

A stripped-back, refinance-only digital loan against a full-feature digital bank. Unloan keeps it simple with a rate that drops a little each year; Macquarie offers offset and purchase loans. Which fits depends on what you need from the loan.

Compare →

Unloan vs loans.com.au

Two low-rate online lenders with different scope. Unloan is refinance-only with a rate that shrinks over time; loans.com.au handles purchases too and offers an offset sub-account. Here's which suits your loan.

Compare →

CommBank vs Westpac

Australia's two largest banks, head to head on their owner-occupier variable home loans. Both offer offset, packages and branch networks — so the decision often comes down to the rate on offer and where you already bank.

Compare →

ANZ vs NAB

Two of the big four compared on their owner-occupier variable home loans. Features are broadly similar — offset, packages, branches — so the rate and your banking relationship usually tip the balance.

Compare →

loans.com.au vs Macquarie

A low-rate online lender against a full-feature digital bank — and both handle purchases and offer an offset. The decision comes down to rate, offset setup, and how much you value an established banking app.

Compare →

CommBank vs Unloan

Same banking group, two very different loans: CommBank's full-feature Wealth Package with offset and branches, against Unloan — CBA's digital refinance-only brand with a lower rate, a loyalty discount and no fees.

Compare →

Westpac vs ANZ

Two of the big four on their sharpest owner-occupier variable offers — Westpac's online-only Flexi First pricing against ANZ's Simplicity PLUS special offer. Features are close; the current rate and eligibility conditions decide it.

Compare →

HSBC vs Macquarie

Two banks that consistently undercut the big four on variable rates, with LVR-tiered pricing on both sides. The gap between them is usually small — equity level, offset needs and banking preference tip the scales.

Compare →

Credit cards

ANZ FF Black vs Westpac Altitude

Two premium big-bank Qantas Points cards with large sign-up bonuses and travel perks. The trade-off is the size of the bonus against the annual fee — and the lounge and insurance extras that come with each.

Compare →

Amex Qantas vs Velocity

Two American Express rewards cards that differ mainly in airline program — Qantas Points versus Velocity. If you're loyal to one airline, that usually settles it; otherwise it comes down to the perks and fee.

Compare →

CommBank vs ANZ low rate

Two big-bank low-rate cards for people who sometimes carry a balance. The headline is the low purchase rate; the tie-breaker is the annual fee and the rate you'll actually pay.

Compare →

Qantas Money vs ANZ FF Black

Two cards that earn Qantas Points directly — one issued by Qantas' own money arm, one by a big-four bank. The shape of the bonus differs: all in year one versus split across two years, with different fees and perks attached.

Compare →

Amex Qantas vs Altitude Qantas

Two direct-earning Qantas cards with very different personalities: Amex's strong uncapped-style earn rate and travel credit against Westpac's bigger sign-up bonus on a Mastercard that's accepted everywhere.

Compare →

Amplify Signature vs Altitude Black

Two Westpac Group flagships with matching two-year bonus structures and near-identical earn bands — the real differences are the spend thresholds, the fees, and where each program's points can actually go.

Compare →

NAB Rewards vs CBA Smart Awards

Two big-bank everyday rewards cards with fee-waiver mechanics rather than flat fees. One waives its fee for high spenders and skips international transaction fees; the other waives at a much lower bar and offers an optional Qantas program.

Compare →

Information is general in nature and may change without notice. Not financial advice — confirm current rates and conditions with each provider before applying.